Rajasthan High Court Stays RUHS CUET 2026 Counselling For Nursing, D. Pharma and other Courses
RUHS CUET 2026 Counselling Process Stays: The Rajasthan High Court Has kept the RUHS CUET 2026 Counselling for B.Sc. Nursing, D. Pharma and B.P.T. Courses over pending NOC Applications of Educational Institutions. For instance, the Rajasthan High Court has temporarily halted the implementation of RUHS CUET 2026 Counselling and Allotment Schedule for admission. Admission for B.Sc Nursing, D. Pharma and B.P.T. Courses, observing that allowing the counseling process to continue while applications for No Objection Certificates (NOCs) remained pending for over one and a half years would seriously prejudice educational institutions awaiting approval. The interim order came in a batch of connected writ petitions led by Vivekanad Vidhya Ashram Sansthan v. State of Rajasthan.
RUHS CUET 2026 Counselling Stays: Background of the Case
Several educational institutions approached the High Court alleging that despite the State Government issuing fresh guidelines on 15 October 2024 for establishing nursing colleges and schools. Their applications seeking NOCs had not been decided within the prescribed timeline. Moreover, the petitioners argued that the policy itself required applications to be processed within 90 days, yet many institutions had waited for more than eighteen months despite investing substantial amounts in infrastructure, inspection fees, security deposits and other mandatory requirements. Some institutions had already approached the Court once earlier and obtained directions for expeditious consideration, but those directions were allegedly not.
Direct Link to visit the official website of RUHS click here
RUHS CUET 2026 Counselling: Court’s Observations
Justice Mukes Rajpurohit noted that the Court had repeatedly granted time to the State Government after assurances that a final policy decision regarding pending NOC applications would soon be taken. Moreover, during earlier proceedings, the Court had remarked that once the government framed a policy and invited applications, it was difficult to justify keeping them pending for such a long period. The Court had also observed that institutions had already created the required infrastructure and had suffered the loss of one academic session despite no fault on their part.
Furthermore, the Court had previously observed:
The record before the Court also showed that although 676 applications had been received under the 2024 guidelines and 73 institutions had already been granted NOCs, the State had not satisfactorily explained why only certain applications were processed while many others remained pending. In several cases, inspections had not even been carried out despite files being ready.
Counselling Notification Triggered Fresh Concern
When the matter was taken up on 29 June 2026, the petitioners produced the RUHS notification dated 11 June 2026 announcing the counselling and the allotment schedule. Moreover, they argued that commencing counselling before deciding their pending NOC applications would effectively deprive them of another academic year and defeat the purpose of the litigation. On behalf of the State, the Additional Advocate General informed the Court that the issue was under active consideration and requested about two more weeks to enable the Government to take an appropriate decision.
Court’s Reasoning for Pending NOCs
The High Court Observed that despite repeated opportunities and assurances by the State, no final decision had yet been taken on the long- pending NOC applications. Moreover, the Court further noted that it had earlier refrained from interfering with the counselling process because the State had represented that no counselling notification had been issued. However, the notification dated 11 June 2026 showed that the admission process had now commenced.
Justice Rajprohit observed that permitting counselling to proceed before deciding the pending NOC applications would cause irreparable prejudice to institutions whose applications had remained pending because of administrative inaction. Moreover, referring to an earlier Division Bench judgment in Fortune Foundation , the Court also noted that NOC’s seeking applicaions should consider before the commencement of counselling so that eligible institutions could participate in admission process.
RUHS CUET 2026 Couselling: Court’s Decision
Considering the circumstances, the Rajasthan High Court passed an interim order directing that the operation and implementation of the RUHS CUET 2026 Counselling and Allotment Schedule, notified on 11 June 2026, shall remain in abeyance in relation to admission to B.Sc. Nursing , D. Pharm, and B.P.T. courses until the next date of hiring. Additionally, the Court directed that the batch of petitions will list again on 15 July 2026.
Also Read: SBI PO Recruitment Notification 2026 Out for 1500 Posts
